_parenting   babies

Babies in the News: The Non-Twin Twins

by Valorie Delp | More from this Blogger

14 Jan 2008 01:13 PM

Here's a riddle for you: Two babies are born just one minute a part. They are not twins and one baby is three weeks older than the other--well, technically speaking. Yet to their parents, this brother and sister duo will always feel like a set of twins. Confused? This is the true story for one set of "non-twins"--Harriet and Thomas Millineux.

At seven weeks gestation, mom knew something wasn't right and went to the hospital to learn that she was carrying twins, but one had died and was being reabsorbed into her body. This is also known as vanishing twin syndrome and doctors think that it is moderately common. At this scan there was another 'blob' detected, but it was assumed that this was leftover tissue and Mrs. Millineux was told to return to the hospital in two weeks.

Superfetation

At her next appointment that little blob had grown into a baby. . .only three weeks younger than the one she was already carrying! Hers is a rare case of superfetation--a condition in which a mother releases an egg for fertilization every month despite being pregnant. This could've meant that technically, she could have become pregnant with a new baby every single month during her entire pregnancy.

Superfetation is extremely rare. The last recorded case that I could find was in 2006. I suspect that until relatively recently (within the last decade), when sonogram and imaging equipment became much more advanced, superfetation was simply unheard of.

Twins (or rather 'non-twins') can also be created when a mother releases two eggs during one cycle and they are fertilized separately. just about the only way that you would know this had occurred however, is if the eggs were fertilized by separate men. Technically the resulting babies would be half-siblings. (This is known as superfecundation.)

Situations like this are starting to challenge our traditional definition of twins. Certainly, regardless of whether or not the Mellineux siblings are technically twins, they seem like it to their parents and no doubt telling people they are is just much easier to explain!

 
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Learn more about Valorie Delp
twinzplus3`s avatar

Hello everybody! My name is Valorie and I am one busy lady! When I'm not writing or editing for families, I am busy trying to get my brood of 5 in line.

View Full Profile | More from this Blogger



User Comments

Lindsay Gray (19058) 14 Jan 2008 01:50 PM

That's unreal! I never knew something like that existed!

Kara Online! (21380) 14 Jan 2008 09:57 PM

I think that is way too cool but...not so much for the younger one, I would think. Wouldn't that make it harder on the younger one being born at least 3 weeks early, at least?

Valorie Delp (49340) 15 Jan 2008 05:52 AM

I know. . .isn't this just about the oddest think you've ever seen? Except for the one where they were twins with two fathers. . .that's even weirder I think. ;-)

Oh and Kara yes, they were both a little early. The first one was technically 2 weeks early which made the second one 5 weeks early. The second one was 4lbs. something. They were born via c/s (I assume--they were 1 minute apart) and so I assume it was an early c/s to avoid some complication in the mother. The article didn't go into detail but said the pregnancy was quite complicated. But both babies are fine now. ;-)

Kara Online! (21380) 15 Jan 2008 03:26 PM

I am glad they're fine...I wonder what it must be like to have two at once sometimes I even think I want that but then I look at my 15 almost 16 month old climbing on everything and I change my mind! I would love them the same though if it did happen. Twice the worry.

QueenAngie Central Illinois, USA Online! (60106) 02 Feb 2008 02:07 PM

New to me! Thank you for giving us this new information, Valerie!

Joenie (5) 20 Apr 2008 07:29 PM

Wow! That is something! Twins are cool although the 1st yr is an extension of the 3rd trimester. Mine are B&G 13 month olds.

Valorie Delp (49340) 21 Apr 2008 03:26 AM

Well that's only true if your twins were born early. Mine were full term. . .born at 40 weeks exactly so the first year was. . .exhausting!

Discuss this article

You must be logged in to tag, rate, or comment on this item. Not registered? Register now, it's free and only takes a minute.



Signup for our free community and join the conversation with 450,683 registered users active members!
Username
Password
Email
Birth Date
Gender Female Male
Agree to terms of use.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | Blog For Us! | Be a Moderator! | Advertise with Us | Help